1959 BLR ( H C ) 257 ဇာရီမှုကိုဆိုင်းငံ့သောအမိန့်သည်ပုဒ်မ၄၇တွင်အကျုံးမဝင်။
ဆရာကြီးဦးမြသင်ကြားပို့ချချက်များ
1959 BLR ( H C ) 257
Ma Tun v. Ma Ah Nyo.
Before U San Maung , J.
အမှုတွင်၊ဇာရီမှုကိုဆိုင်းငံ့သောအမိန့်သည်ပုဒ်မ၄၇တွင်အကျုံးမဝင်ကြောင်း၊တရားဝန်ကြီးဦးစံမောင်ကအောက်ပါအတိုင်းဆုံးဖြတ်သည်-
“Held that an order for stay of execution of a decree pending a suit between the decree-holder and a judgment-debtor is one made under Order 21, rule.29 of the Civil Procedure Code and is not appealable as a decree, as it cannot be deemed to be conclusively determining the rights and liabilities of the parties with reference to thd relief granted by the decree.”
စီရင်ထုံးစာမျက်နှာ၂၅၇ခေါင်းစီးတွင်” Civil Revision “ဟုဖော်ပြထားသည်။
စီရင်ထုံးစာမျက်နှာ၂၅၇အောက်ခြေမှတ်စုတွင်-
“Civil Revision No.10 of 1958 against the order of the District Court of Toungoo in Civil Misc. Appeal No.21 of 1957, dated the 30th December 1957.”
ဟုဖော်ပြထားသည်။
အထက်ပါဖော်ပြချက်အရဆိုလျင်မြို့နယ်တရားရုံး၏အဆုံးအဖြတ်အားမကျေနပ်၍တောင်ငူခရိုင်တရားမရုံးသို့တရားမအထွေထွေအယူခံမှုတင်သွင်းသောမအညို၏လျှောက်ထားချက်အားခွင့်ပြုခဲ့သည်။
တောင်ငူခရိုင်တရားရုံး၏တရားမအထွေထွေအယူခံမှုတွင်ချမှတ်သောဆုံးဖြတ်ချက်အားမထွန်းကမကျေနပ်သဖြင့်တရားလွှတ်တော်သို့တရားမပြင်ဆင်မှုတင်သွင်းလာခြင်းဖြစ်သည်။
စီရင်ထုံးစာမျက်နှာ၂၅၈တွင်တရားဝန်ကြီးဦးစံမောင်ကအောက်ပါအတိုင်းဖော်ပြသည်-
“After the filing of the suit Ma Tun filed an application for stay of execution of the decree obtained against her by Ma Ah Nyo in Civil Regular Suit No.14 of 1956 and the learned Township Judge by his order, dated the 2nd November 1957, granted her application.
The respondent Ma Ah Nyo then filed an appeal in the District Court of Toungoo against the order of the learned Township Judge staying execution of the decree and the learned District Judge by his order in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.21 of 1957 set aside the order of the learned Township Judge staying execution of the decree.
In doing so the learned District Judge observed that the Township Judge was wrong in allowing the stay of execution because of the provisions of Order 41, rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code which prohibited an executing Court from considering an application for stay of execution after the time allowed for appeal against the decree had expired.
In the present application for revision by Ma Tun it is contended that the learned District Judge was wrong in applying Order 41, rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code when the provision of the Code applicable to the case was Order 21, rule 29.
In my opinion, this contention must be allowed to prevail.”
ထို့အပြင်၁၉၅၇ခုနှစ်က၎င်းကိုယ်တိုင်ဆုံးဖြတ်ခဲ့သော၊1957 BLR ( H C ) 16 , Maung Tha Saing v. Ma Ain Tha စီရင်ထုံးနှင့်ခြားနားကြောင်း(distinguished)စီရင်ထုံးစာမျက်နှာ၂၅၉နှင့်၂၆၀တွင်အောက်ပါအတိုင်းဝေဖန်သုံးသပ်ပြသည်-
“In my judgment in Maung Tha Saing v. Ma Ain Tha (1957 BLR 16), I had occasion to comment upon the decision in the case of U San Wa and others v. U Chit San and another (9 Rangoon 354) and Janardan Triumbak Gadre v. Martand Triumbak Gadre (45 Bombay 241).
I pointed out that in some exceptional cases an order staying execution may be”the determination of a question under section 47” within the meaning of section 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Code, if the order can be deemed as conclusively determination the rights and liabilities of the parties with reference to the relief granted by the decree.
However, in my opinion an order for stay of execution of a decree pending a suit between the decree-holder and a judgment-debtor as provided for in Order 21, rule 29 of the Civil Procedure Code, is not appealable as a decree, as it cannot be deemed to be conclusively determining the rights and liabilities of the parties with reference to the relief granted by the decree.
Such a stay only postpones the execution of the decree during the pendency of a suit in the same Court.
The present case is therefore distinguishable from that dealt with by me in Maung Tha Saing v. Ma Ain Tha.”
တရားဝန်ကြီးဦးစံမောင်ကိုယ်တိုင်ဆုံးဖြတ်၊ခြားနားပြသော၊1957 BLR ( H C ) 16 နှင့် 1959 BLR ( H C ) 257 စီရင်ထုံးနှစ်ရပ်အားပူးတွဲမှတ်သားဖတ်ရှုလေ့လာရန်ဖြစ်သည်။
Comments
Post a Comment